IDnet Ohio’s Blog on Truth

Post your comments and criticisms of the essay entitled, Darwinism: Not a Chance, So Don’t Bet Your Life. If you have not read it, you can read it here:  http://www.arn.org/blogs/index.php/2/2008/06/30/darwinism_not_a_chance_so_dona_t_bet_you

Do you have evidence of unplanned genetic mutations producing the information-creating, morphology-changing, cellular factory-building raw material for unguided “selection” to preserve?  If so, post it here for the world to see.

Wonder why this question?  You should read this essay first:  http://www.arn.org/blogs/index.php/2/2008/06/30/darwinism_not_a_chance_so_dona_t_bet_you

What do you think?  Do you think if the Bible did not exist more people would be creationists? Remember, “creationist” here means anyone who believes that a creative being was somehow involved in creation.

If you are not a creationist (in the broadest sense of the term; i.e., you believe you are ultimately created by an intelligence), the WHAT ARE YOU? 

Please think about this before you answer; there is only one right answer. 

What is the nature of science, and how does it relate to truth?  Should science be concerned with truth, even if truth means intelligent design of life?  Let us know your thoughts. Cogent, well-written thoughts will be published (anonymously, if desired, let us know) on a future page of IDnet Ohio.

Here’s a public place for you to provide YOUR opinion on the creation/intelligent design/evolution debate, as well as comment on any of the content of IDnet Ohio’s website.

Select entries will be chosen for posting (anonymously) on a future page on IDnet Ohio’s website. If you want yours selected, make it insightful, engaging, and original.

Click on the “Comments” button below.

Welcome to all who come from Access Research Network’s ID Report.  This month’s column:  Holy, Wholly, Holey, Merciless and Mighty.  For those who have not read it, you can go HERE.

Here is a snippet of the essay:

History shows that transparent duplicity thrives among ideologues high on certainty and low on tolerance. Certainty, like safety, is better in numbers, and Darwinists know they have the upper cultural hand in a world steeped in the faith of naturalism–the philosophical idea that all nature can be explained as the sole result of unguided physical processes. Regardless of the actual truth of the matter, with Origin of Species in one hand and a sword in the other, Darwin’s miscreant recreants believe might makes truth-be-damned right. As a result the world is faced with a growing number of distorted-truth brokers in a new breed of merciless humans: religious Darwinists. Whether Holy, Wholly, or Holey, Darwin may not be Lord or God, but he is almighty.

What do you think?  Are Darwinists guilty of acting like a Holy Order at the institutional level (i.e., universities, NAS, public schools)?  If you agree, why?  If you disagree, why?  Please give evidence.  

Welcome to IDnet Ohio’s blog, a place for you to comment on, contradict, or otherwise criticize ideas, thoughts, and views of Intelligent Design Network of Ohio.  Here’s an easy question to start the blog:

Should institutions of higher education (e.g., colleges, universities), foster an environment of objectivity when it comes to origins science?  If not, why not?