Intelligent Design Network’s Blog on Truth

6 Responses to “”

1. Jason Says:
   April 25th, 2008 at 5:23 pm

   You are an accidentologist.

2. Historicus Says:
   April 25th, 2008 at 5:56 pm

   Actually, accidentology is a splinter cult from the larger randomology. Most randomologists worship in the tabernacle of coincidentalism. But not all coincidentalites are randomologist.

3. aiguy Says:
   April 25th, 2008 at 8:32 pm

   Only one right answer? In that case I would go with “non-creationist in the broadest sense”. That’s got to be right.

   I’m guessing you’re looking for another answer, however… perhaps “atheist”?

   But that isn’t right. For example, I might be a theist who believes in abiogenesis and evolution. I might believe in a god who is supernatural, transcends matter, time, and space, and is omnipotent and omniscient, but didn’t actually create life. Instead, He decided to create a universe where life might or might not evolve, and chose not to think ahead to the point where He would know if life would evolve or not (sort of the way He likes to be surprised by what people will do, rather than deciding everything we do in advance).

4. Dave Says:
   April 27th, 2008 at 6:13 am

   In the “broadest” sense (and in the logical sense) there are only two possiblities, creation or non-creationist. If there is no God then something like evolution must have happened. If there is a God then all bets are off.

5. Dave Says:
   April 27th, 2008 at 6:13 am

   In the “broadest” sense (and in the logical sense) there are only two possiblities, creationist or non-creationist. If there is no God then something like evolution must have happened. If there is a God then all bets are off.

6. Administrator Says:
   June 17th, 2008 at 2:27 am

   You all are very close. But what is the affirmative label for someone who is a non-creationist?

Leave a Reply

Name

Mail (will not be published)

Website